pipp3355
Member Profile
Member Since: 2006-12-28
Last Power Points used: never • Available: now
Max Power Points: 2
Last Power Points used: never • Available: now
Max Power Points: 2
Comments
Documentaries Videos Submitted by pipp3355Navigation
- profile
- unsifted videos (0)
- personal queue videos (0)
- sifted videos (45)
- promoted published vids
- promoted queued vids
- promoted Sift Talk posts
- promoted blog posts
- blog entries (0)
- Sift Talk posts
- discarded posts
- dead/deadpool videos (10)
- my playlist bookmarks
- my post bookmarks
- playlists bookmarked by others
- posts bookmarked by others
- voted up
- voted down
- playlists
Member Stats
Rank: 193
Rating:
48 star points
Votes Received: 1176
Votes Cast: 527
Comments Posted: 543 • browse
Comments Applauded: 1
Sifted Videos: 45
Sift Talk Posts: 17
Quality Sift Talk Posts: 2
Profile Views: 10398
Rating:
48 star pointsVotes Received: 1176
Votes Cast: 527
Comments Posted: 543 • browse
Comments Applauded: 1
Sifted Videos: 45
Sift Talk Posts: 17
Quality Sift Talk Posts: 2
Profile Views: 10398
does that mean that technically its ok to try to kick the ball out of the goal keepers hands?
Negative. It's not legal to interfere with the goalkeeper while he has control of the ball. Once the ball is placed on the ground it's no longer in his control.
Change it to:
and it will not be all stretched out.
In reply to this comment by pipp3355:
*dead
replacement: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE3S7pfe6mc
In reply to your comment:
“shit, real sorry. i don't remember any of that. ”
In reply to your comment:
“done! its at the front of the queue again..
In reply to your comment:
“Hey, I fixed my movie link, but it got discarded anyways. Can you undo this, please?
In reply to your comment:
“*dead
”””
In reply to your comment:
“*dead
”
In reply to your comment:
“had a look at the youtube profile. no evidence to ban. but why would someone post this when there are much better barber shop vids on youtube?
like this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nixXL3OIZ-8”
you could ask one of the admins to return it to sifttalk, explaining what happened.
it's always BAD to discard things without discussing it (and, no, two people who agree and take a decision between themselves without waiting for other resposes is not a discussion).
i understand you didn't mean to really discard it in the first place, one reason more to return it to sift talk.
In reply to your comment:
“why can't i *save this?
sorry guys, i'll save or promote a post by whoever saves this.”
In reply to your comment:
“
shit! no i didn't mean to discard it at all. can i save it myself?
You didn't really mean to discard this did you, pipp? Damn, I'd save it so there can be more discussion, but I don't want to waste a save. Always new members that can benefit from these sift talks.
In reply to your comment:
“" The unwritten rule that's always been observed is to allow a near dupe if the content is very different (in this case it is not) or the dupe contains much more content in addition to the original post (again, not the case here).
There is really no reason this should not already be *discarded. We can not establish the precedent that everyone should go about finding what they feel are "better" embeds and intentionally posting dupes."
I suggest this is included in the sift posting guidelines.
”
In reply to your comment:
“*dead
”